Privacy Issues of Internet of Things-Free-Samples for Students

Questions: 1.What does the statement "the best interface for a system is no User Interface"? 2.Compare the bandwidth, distance, interference rating, cost and security of a) twisted pair cable, b) coaxial cable and 3) fibre optic cable. 3.Compare the three technologies by addressing the advantages, disadvantages, key requirements for the things. 4.Discuss the issues associated with security and privacy in the context of the Internet of Things. 5.how much of its time budget can be saved by redesigning the application to use the publish/subscribe communication model in lieu of the command/response approach? 6.Describe Nielson's Law. How does it relate to Moore's Law? What are the implications for the Internet of Thing? Answers: 1.The explanation of the phrase the best interface for a system is no user interface is that it eliminates the development of the user interface for executing the application function at any technology. It would eliminate the scope for requirement of an interface while processing the functions of the application by using the technology. The requirement of extra time for the user to operate in the system would be relinquished by using the no user interface system. The number of steps required for the operation of the project would be decreased by using the no interface system in the applications. The benefit of the phrase the best interface for a system is no user interface can be explained with the help of following examples, Example 1: The functions of the cars have been developed with the help of new user interface for opening the gate of the car by using the wireless mobile network (Takai et al., 2013). The number of steps in the opening or closing of the door have been increased as the user first have to open the application in the mobile device, then go to the option of opening the car door from the mobile, and request for opening the gate of the car. The network connection would send the request for opening the door to the server. The server would search for the appropriate network of the car and it would forward the query to the network. The car would receive the request and it would process for opening the door. It would be time consuming and the overall time duration of the project would be very high. The need for the user interface could be reduced for forming the minimum time duration requirement for the project. Example 2: The payment through gateway would be deployed for forming the improvement of the operations and it had formed the effective role in the payment through development process (Fisher, 2013). The payment gateway would comprise of making the appropriate formation of the system development. However, the payment gateway would comprise of a number of steps first signing in the platform application, requesting the payment through the bank server, the bank would process the payment, and the payment would be received. All these processes are involved in the payment gateway platform and it would result in forming the issue of exhaustion of resources. The removal of user interface would result in forming the solution for exhaustion of resources and would increase the process of payment system. 2.The specification of the cables and the categorization of the cables had been done in the following tables, Cable Types Coaxial Cable Twisted Pair Cable Fiber Optic Cable Bandwidth 1GHz 1MHz 75THz Distance 500m 100m 10 Km when on Single mode 2Km when on Multi mode Interference rating Has the tendency of being least vulnerable to interference when compare to the other two types of cables Has the tendency of being limited to distance and vulnerable to interference Has the tendency of not being vulnerable to the interference Cost Medium costing of the cable when compare to the other two types of cables Cheaper than the other two types of cables Highest expensive when compare to the other two types of cables Security As opined by Winzer (2014), the security would be moderate when compare to the other two types of cables Very Poor in compare to the other two types of cables It is the most secured type of cable that can be used for network connection Specification of the cables categories Co-Axial Cable: According to Ha et al. (2013), there are three types of Co-Axial Cable namely Type 1, Type 2, and Type 3. The Type 1 Co-Axial cable has the specification of 50 Ohm, RG-11 or Rg-7, and it is applicable for thick power Ethernet. The Type 2 Co-Axial cable has the specification of 50 Ohm, RG-58, and it is applicable with thin power Internet. The Type 3 Co-Axial cable has the specification of 75 Ohm, RG-59, and it is applicable with cable television. Twister Pair Cable: According to Lee et al. (2013), there are three types of Unprotected Twister Pair Cable namely Type 1, Type 2, and Type 3. The Type 1 Unprotected Twister Pair cable is basically used for telephone lines and low speed internet data cable. The Type 2 Shielded Twisted Pair cable is basically used for supporting the 4 MPS implementation. The Type 3 Foil Shielded Twister Pair cable is basically used for supporting maximum 16 MPS (although it is used for 10 MPS only). Fibre Optic Cable: There are three types of Fibre Optic Cable and they are Single Mode Fibre Optic Cable, Multi Mode Fibre Optic Cable, and Plastic Fibre Optic Cable. These three cables have different ranges of 2Km, 10Km, and 16km respectively. 3.The following table would analyse the advantages, disadvantages, and application of using Internet of Things, IoT Devices: Sensors Advantages: High current capability and low cost of maintenance for forming the low tech sensing. Disadvantages: The sensor would require the physical contact and it is slow in response Application: Interlocking, Packaging, and parts detection IoT Devices: RFID Advantages: Can be read without the use of line of sight and multiple tags are allowed Disadvantages: Costly in use and a number of processing are involved Application: Tracking of products like jewellery, pallet, and apparel tracking IoT Devices: Video Tracking Advantages: Effective communication and automation of the control functions Disadvantages: Complex system and privacy exposure is probable Application: Human to computer interaction and the augmentation of the reality is possible 4.Security Issues: According to Suo et al. (2012), the security issues can be described as the harms on the IoT applications that can be occurred due to unauthorized access resulting in misuse of the information for their personal benefits. Privacy Issues: As opined by Borgohian, Kumar and Sanyal (2015) the direct involvement of the private and sensitive information as such account details, precise geo-location and health location have to face the issue of exposure of the personal information such as physical condition, habits, and locations. 5.Blocking Mode- The blocking mode is characterized by the occurrence of the operating request of the user and orientation of the endpoint for involving the longer and waiting times of operation. The blocking mode is a synchronous mode where the original message would not be received by the originator.Publish or Subscribe Paradigm- The Publish or Subscribe Paradigm is also referred to as pub or sub paradigm and it helps in enabling the unidirectional communication to subscribers or publishers (more than one). Figure 1: Publish or Subscribe Paradigm Command or Response Paradigm: Command or Response Paradigm would be helpful for communication when the case of overhead of not required messages travel in reverse direction. Figure 2: Command or Response paradigm Total time saving= propagation delay of 12ms + time required for receiving the message 1ms = 13ms 6.Nielsons law: The Nielsons law can be understood as the evaluation of the bandwidth used by the users for increasing the value to 150% of the original value. The data records had been collected in between the year of 1983 to 2016. The following graph had been extracted from his studies, Figure 3: Graph Population V/S Year (Source: Nielsen 2014) Relation with Moores law: Both the laws are very similar as Nielson stated that the growth of bandwidth of users is increasing by 50 % per year and Moore stated that computer double in capabilities every 18 months and this is 60% of the annual growth. Nielsons law and IoT: The Nielsons law can be implied in IoT for deducing the fact that till the year of 2024, the sensor technology would see the remarkable growth and it would help in data stream creation. The microchips would be used widely along with body and skin sensors References Borgohain, T., Kumar, U., Sanyal, S. (2015). Survey of security and privacy issues of Internet of Things.arXiv preprint arXiv:1501.02211. Fisher, M. (2013).U.S. Patent No. 8,352,323. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Ha, S. K., Kim, G. S., Choi, S. M., Kim, S. K., Kim, J. G., Park, M., ... Sim, K. (2013). PHILS based protection system design for an HTS power cable installed in a grid. , 339-340. Lee, W., Cheon, M., Hyun, C. H., Park, M. (2013). Development of building fire safety system with automatic security firm monitoring capability.Fire safety journal,58, 65-73. Nielsen, J. (2014). Nielsens Law of Internet Bandwidth, 1998. Singh, D., Tripathi, G., Jara, A. J. (2014, March). A survey of Internet-of-Things: Future vision, architecture, challenges and services. InInternet of things (WF-IoT), 2014 IEEE world forum on(pp. 287-292). IEEE. Sommer, J., Franz, W. (2012). A Component-based Simulation Model and its Implementation of a Switched Ethernet Network. Suo, H., Wan, J., Zou, C., Liu, J. (2012, March). Security in the internet of things: a review. InComputer Science and Electronics Engineering (ICCSEE), 2012 international conference on(Vol. 3, pp. 648-651). IEEE. Takai, I., Ito, S., Yasutomi, K., Kagawa, K., Andoh, M., Kawahito, S. (2013). LED and CMOS image sensor based optical wireless communication system for automotive applications.IEEE Photonics Journal,5(5), 6801418-6801418. Tozlu, S., Senel, M., Mao, W., Keshavarzian, A. (2012). Wi-Fi enabled sensors for internet of things: A practical approach.IEEE Communications Magazine,50(6). Winzer, P. J. (2014). Spatial multiplexing in fiber optics: The 10x scaling of metro/core capacities.Bell Labs Technical Journal,19, 22-30. Borgohain, T., Kumar, U., Sanyal, S. (2015). Survey of security and privacy issues of Internet of Things.arXiv preprint arXiv:1501.02211. Fisher, M. (2013).U.S. Patent No. 8,352,323. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Ha, S. K., Kim, G. S., Choi, S. M., Kim, S. K., Kim, J. G., Park, M., ... Sim, K. (2013). PHILS based protection system design for an HTS power cable installed in a grid. , 339-340. Lee, W., Cheon, M., Hyun, C. H., Park, M. (2013). Development of building fire safety system with automatic security firm monitoring capability.Fire safety journal,58, 65-73. Nielsen, J. (2014). Nielsens Law of Internet Bandwidth, 1998. Singh, D., Tripathi, G., Jara, A. J. (2014, March). A survey of Internet-of-Things: Future vision, architecture, challenges and services. InInternet of things (WF-IoT), 2014 IEEE world forum on(pp. 287-292). IEEE. Sommer, J., Franz, W. (2012). A Component-based Simulation Model and its Implementation of a Switched Ethernet Network. Suo, H., Wan, J., Zou, C., Liu, J. (2012, March). Security in the internet of things: a review. InComputer Science and Electronics Engineering (ICCSEE), 2012 international conference on(Vol. 3, pp. 648-651). IEEE. Takai, I., Ito, S., Yasutomi, K., Kagawa, K., Andoh, M., Kawahito, S. (2013). LED and CMOS image sensor based optical wireless communication system for automotive applications.IEEE Photonics Journal,5(5), 6801418-6801418. Tozlu, S., Senel, M., Mao, W., Keshavarzian, A. (2012). Wi-Fi enabled sensors for internet of things: A practical approach.IEEE Communications Magazine,50(6). Winzer, P. J. (2014). Spatial multiplexing in fiber optics: The 10x scaling of metro/core capacities.Bell Labs Technical Journal,19, 22-30.